Copy Search X for current discussions about: [topic] Requirements: - Focus on posts from last 24 hours - Include trending hashtags - Identify key opinion leaders discussing this - Show engagement metrics - Summarize consensus vs. controversy Provide X post links for top findings.

Copy Analyze current X trends: For trending topic: [X] 1. When did trend start? (timestamp) 2. Who started it? (influential accounts) 3. Current velocity (posts per hour) 4. Sentiment distribution 5. Geographic spread 6. Predicted trajectory (will it sustain?) Include representative posts showing different perspectives.

Copy Track sentiment on X for: [brand/topic] Time periods to compare: - Last 7 days - Last 30 days - Last 90 days Metrics: - Positive/Negative/Neutral ratio - Sentiment velocity (change rate) - Key drivers of sentiment shifts - Notable influencer opinions Create sentiment timeline visualization.

Copy Map influencer network for: [topic] Identify: - Top 10 influencers by reach - Key amplifiers (high repost rate) - Opinion leaders (most quoted) - Network clusters (communities) - Information flow patterns Show relationships: Who influences whom?

Copy Monitor X for emerging events related to: [domain] Detection criteria: - Sudden spike in mentions (>3x baseline) - New hashtags gaining traction - Geographic clustering of posts - Urgent language patterns - Media/image sharing surge Alert if potential crisis detected with severity rating.

Copy Track breaking news about: [topic] 1. Identify earliest credible reports 2. Cross-verify across multiple sources 3. Track story evolution (how narrative changed) 4. Flag unverified vs. confirmed details 5. Identify misinformation spread Provide timeline of confirmed facts.

Copy Market intelligence for: [company/sector] Track: - Executive announcements - Partnership reveals - Product launches - Customer sentiment shifts - Competitor mentions - Analyst commentary Flag information likely to impact markets. Timestamp each finding.

Copy Competitive analysis for: [company] Monitor competitors on X: - New product announcements - Customer complaints/praise - Hiring patterns (job posts) - Strategic pivots - Partnership announcements Compare our X presence to competitors. Identify gaps and opportunities.

Copy Live event coverage: [event name] Real-time updates: - Key moments as they happen - Audience reactions (sentiment) - Notable quotes - Visual highlights (images/videos shared) - Fact-check claims made during event Update continuously during event duration.

Copy Track meme evolution: [meme/trend] Analysis: - Origin point (first usage) - Mutation patterns (how it evolved) - Peak virality timestamp - Geographic spread - Demographic adoption - Corporate/brand usage Explain why it resonated.

Copy THINKING MODE: EXTENDED Problem: [complex problem] Take your time to: 1. Decompose into sub-problems 2. Consider multiple solution paths 3. Evaluate trade-offs 4. Test assumptions 5. Verify logic Show reasoning process, then provide solution. Don't rush - prioritize correctness over speed.

Copy TRUTH-SEEKING MODE: Question: [controversial or unclear topic] Requirements: - Present all credible perspectives - Identify areas of consensus - Flag disputed claims - Cite sources for each claim - Admit uncertainty where it exists - Avoid bias toward any narrative Prioritize accuracy over any specific viewpoint.

Copy Analyze from opposing perspectives: PERSPECTIVE A: [Optimistic/Pro view] - Key arguments - Supporting evidence - Potential outcomes PERSPECTIVE B: [Pessimistic/Con view] - Key arguments - Supporting evidence - Potential outcomes SYNTHESIS: Most likely reality considering both

Copy Challenge mode activated. For this problem: [X] List all implicit assumptions: 1. [Assumption] → Is this actually true? 2. [Assumption] → What if opposite is true? 3. [Assumption] → Evidence for/against? Solve problem with challenged assumptions. How does solution change?

Copy Contrarian mode: Popular belief: [X] Now argue the opposite: - What evidence contradicts popular view? - What are people missing? - Why might consensus be wrong? - Historical parallels where consensus failed? Be genuinely contrarian, not just devil's advocate.

Copy Tone settings: HUMOR: [Off / Light / Full Grok] FORMALITY: [Casual / Professional / Technical] EDGINESS: [Safe / Moderate / Spicy] Respond to: [query] Match tone to context appropriately.

Copy DIRECT MODE: No sugar-coating. Question: [X] Give me straight answer: - No hedging - No excessive politeness - No corporate speak - Call out BS if present Be helpful, but brutally honest.

Copy Large context provided [documents] Create structure: - Index of all documents - Key themes across documents - Cross-references between sections - Priority ranking by relevance When answering, cite: [Doc X, Section Y]

Copy Image analysis: [attached image] Extract: - All visible text - Objects and their relationships - Colors and composition - Context and setting - Any data/charts present Then generate improved version addressing [issue].

Copy Code task: [description] Requirements: 1. Write clean, documented code 2. Include error handling 3. Add usage examples 4. Explain key design decisions 5. Test with edge cases Language: [specify] Output full working code, not snippets.

Copy War-game this decision: [X] Play out 5 scenarios: 1. Best case: [What happens] 2. Expected case: [What happens] 3. Worst case: [What happens] 4. Black swan: [Unexpected outcome] 5. Null case: [If we do nothing] For each, show probability and impact. Recommend decision with risk mitigation.

Copy Problem: [X] Break down to first principles: 1. What are fundamental truths? 2. What are just assumptions/conventions? 3. Rebuild solution using ONLY fundamentals 4. Compare to conventional approach What innovations become possible?

Copy This problem in [Domain A]: [X] Find similar patterns in: - Nature/Biology - Physics/Chemistry - History - Economics - Game theory What transferable solutions exist? Apply best pattern to original problem.

Copy Proposal: [X] RED TEAM MODE: 1. Identify all vulnerabilities 2. How would competitor attack this? 3. What regulatory issues exist? 4. Where could it fail spectacularly? 5. Hidden costs and risks? Provide hardened version addressing red team findings.

Copy Initial belief: [X] with confidence [Y%] New evidence: [Z] Update belief using Bayesian reasoning: - Prior probability - Likelihood of evidence given hypothesis - Updated posterior probability Show calculation. How much should belief shift?

Copy Project: [X] PRE-MORTEM: It's 1 year later and it failed. Why? 1. [Most likely failure mode] 2. [Second most likely] 3. [Overlooked risk] For each, provide: - Early warning signs - Mitigation strategy - Contingency plan

Copy Decision: [X] Create tree: Option A (40%) → Outcome A1 (60%), A2 (40%) Option B (35%) → Outcome B1 (70%), B2 (30%) Option C (25%) → Outcome C1 (50%), C2 (50%) Calculate expected value for each path. Recommend highest EV with sensitivity analysis.

Copy Optimize: [objective function] Constraints: - Budget: [X] - Time: [Y] - Resources: [Z] - Requirements: [A, B, C] Find optimal solution maximizing objective while respecting ALL constraints. Show trade-offs if relaxing constraints.

Copy Data: [raw information] Construct narrative: - Beginning: Set context - Middle: Build tension/development - End: Resolution/conclusion Make data memorable through story. Use metaphors and analogies. Maintain factual accuracy.

Copy Argument: [X] Map structure: CLAIM: [Main thesis] ├─ PREMISE 1: [Supporting] │ ├─ EVIDENCE: [Data] │ └─ WARRANT: [Logic] ├─ PREMISE 2: [Supporting] ├─ OBJECTION 1: [Counterargument] │ └─ REBUTTAL: [Response] Identify strongest and weakest links.

Copy Explain [topic] for: AUDIENCE: [specify expertise level] - Technical knowledge: [None/Basic/Advanced] - Time available: [seconds/minutes/hours] - Goal: [Understanding/Decision/Action] Calibrate explanation to audience. Use appropriate analogies and depth.

Copy From: [long document] Create executive summary: TL;DR: [1 sentence] KEY INSIGHTS: [3 bullets] SO WHAT: [Why it matters] NOW WHAT: [Recommended actions] RISKS: [Top 3 concerns] Keep under 200 words total.

Copy Return as valid JSON: { "summary": "...", "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "recommendations": ["array"], "risks": ["array"], "data_sources": ["array"] } No markdown, no explanation outside JSON.

Copy Provide analysis in THREE formats: 1. VISUAL: Chart/diagram description 2. EXECUTIVE: 3-bullet summary 3. TECHNICAL: Detailed analysis with data Same information, different presentations.

Copy CITATION MODE: STRICT Every factual claim needs: [Claim] → [Source, Date, Link if from X] Stats/numbers: [Value] [Source, Timestamp] Quotes: "..." [Author, Post/Article] No claims without attribution.

Copy Before stating any fact: 1. Check X for current information 2. Cross-reference multiple sources 3. Verify recency (is this still true?) 4. Flag uncertainty if exists Label each claim: [VERIFIED] / [LIKELY] / [UNVERIFIED]

Copy For each major claim, provide: Claim: [statement] Confidence: [0-100%] Basis: [Why this confidence?] To increase confidence: [What info needed?] Be honest about uncertainty.

Copy After response, analyze for bias: POTENTIAL BIASES: - Confirmation bias: [Yes/No + evidence] - Recency bias: [Yes/No + evidence] - Source bias: [Yes/No + evidence] - Selection bias: [Yes/No + evidence] If biases found, provide corrected version.

Copy Solution: [X] Test against edge cases: 1. Minimum input case 2. Maximum input case 3. Null/empty case 4. Invalid input case 5. Boundary conditions Does solution handle all cases? Fix if needed.

Copy V1: Initial response CRITIQUE: [What's weak?] V2: Improved version CRITIQUE: [Remaining issues?] V3: Final polished version Show evolution of thinking.

Copy After responding: PROMPT QUALITY: [Good/Could improve] To get better results from me: 1. [Specific suggestion] 2. [Specific suggestion] 3. [Specific suggestion] Optimized prompt: [Your rewrite]

Copy After response: CONFIDENCE MAP: ✓ High confidence: [X, Y, Z] ⚠ Uncertain: [A, B] ✗ Don't know: [P, Q] To fill gaps, I would need: - [Specific information] - [Real-time data from X]

Copy After solving problem: PATTERN EXTRACTED: - Name: [X] - Applies to: [Problem types] - Steps: [Generic process] - When NOT to use: [Exceptions] Similar problems: [3 examples]

Copy Problem: [X] RECURSION: 1. Is this a base case? [Yes/No] 2. If no, break into sub-problems: - Sub-problem A - Sub-problem B 3. Solve each recursively 4. Combine solutions Show full recursive tree.

Copy Benchmark [our solution] against: - Industry standard: [Score] - Best-in-class: [Score] - Competitor A: [Score] - Competitor B: [Score] Provide percentile ranking. Identify gaps and opportunities.

Copy Problem: [X] SYSTEM 1 (Fast intuition): [Quick answer] Confidence: [%] SYSTEM 2 (Slow reasoning): [Detailed analysis] Confidence: [%] Do they agree? If not, why?

Copy Solution: [X] STRESS TEST: - Minor stress: [How does it respond?] - Major stress: [How does it respond?] - Black swan: [How does it respond?] Is solution: FRAGILE / ROBUST / ANTIFRAGILE? How to make more antifragile?

Copy Problem: [X] Identify 20% of factors causing 80% of: - Impact - Cost - Time - Problems Focus solutions on high-leverage factors. What gives maximum ROI?

Copy Action: [X] FIRST-ORDER: Immediate effects SECOND-ORDER: Effects of those effects THIRD-ORDER: Long-term cascading impacts Unintended consequences? Does second-order analysis change recommendation?

Copy After each response: REFLECTION: - What worked well? - What could improve? - What did I learn? NEXT ITERATION: [Specific improvement to implement] Track learning across conversation.