The conversations that decide your career are the ones you would pay good money to avoid. Telling a senior hire it is not working. Pushing back on a board chair who has made up their mind. Raising prices with a loyal customer. Telling your team the layoff list. Telling a candidate the offer is being pulled.
These conversations are not in any playbook because they cannot be templated. Doing them badly costs you ten times what doing them well costs them. Most leaders learn by doing, which is roughly equivalent to learning to drive by crashing.
There is a better option. Not better than therapy, not better than a mentor, but better than rehearsing the conversation in your own head at 2am, which is what most people are actually doing. The better option is structured rehearsal with a model that plays the role of the other person, asks the question you are dreading, and lets you try the conversation three times before you have it once for real.
The HARDER Framework is how to set that up. Six pillars, fifty prompts, one premise: the cheapest version of any hard conversation is the one you have already had with an AI before you have it with the human. LLM agnostic. Works in ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any approved enterprise model.
What is the HARDER Framework
A method for using AI to rehearse the six categories of conversation leaders most often avoid or handle badly. The acronym spells what the conversations actually are.
- H: Hire. Rescinding offers, comp breakdowns, rejecting with the door open, mid process descopes.
- A: Authority. Pushing back on board, investor, founder, boss.
- R: Relationship. Cofounder, peer, partner, mentor talks where the relationship is the variable.
- D: Decline. Saying no to customers, opportunities, favours, intros, expansion.
- E: Endings. Firings, layoffs, vendor breakups, product sunsets, customer churn.
- R: Renegotiation. Raising prices, restructuring partnerships, asking for a raise, walking back commitments.
The prompts under each pillar are not scripts. They are rehearsal structures. The model plays the other person, you play yourself, the conversation happens before the conversation happens.
How to use this guide
Three principles. First, let the model be the difficult party. "Help me write a firing message" gets a generic memo. "Play the employee being fired, ask me the three questions they will ask first" gets you ready. Second, give context: who they are, history, the version of themselves they show up as in conflict. Third, run each prompt at least twice. The second turn is where rehearsal becomes real. Where the prompt says [paste context], be specific.
H: Hire
H1: Rescinding an Offer
Play [candidate] receiving the call where I rescind their offer for [role].
Reason: [paste]. Open with the hardest question they would ask in the
first 60 seconds. Stay in role. Push back if I hedge. After, break role
and tell me where I weakened and which sentence to rewrite.
Candidate context: [paste]
H2: The Comp Negotiation Breakdown
I offered [comp] to [candidate]. They want [counter] above what I can
pay. Decision final. Play the candidate. Make their case across three
rounds. After, tell me which responses sounded principled vs defensive
and the structural change that closes the gap without changing cash.
H3: The Rejection That Leaves the Door Open
I am rejecting [candidate] for [role] after final round. Strong but not
strong enough for this seat. I want to leave a credible future door
open. Generate three call openers. For each, tell me what they will
hear underneath and how it shapes their willingness to engage in 18
months. Strengths and gaps: [paste]
H4: The Reference Disclosure
I just got reference feedback on [candidate] for [role] that changes
my view. Feedback: [paste]. Play the candidate in the follow up where
I cannot burn the reference. Probe me on what specifically I heard.
After, tell me where I crossed the disclosure line and where I stayed safe.
H5: The Mid Process Descope
Partway through interviewing [candidate] for [original role]. The role
I actually need is [smaller / different]. I want to keep them. Play the
candidate hearing the news. Lead with the question they would actually
ask, not the polite one. Tell me whether my framing made it feel like
a downgrade or a different opportunity.
H6: Telling an Internal Applicant No
[Internal person] applied for [role], not the right fit, current
contributor I want to keep. Play them on the call. Push on why, push
on what would have made them a fit. After, tell me whether I gave them
a path or a closed door. Their role and tenure: [paste]
H7: The Probation Reset
[Recent hire] is below the bar at [time period]. I am not firing yet.
I am giving them [weeks] to hit [bar]. Play their role. Probe on what
hitting the bar means, what tools they get, how the call is documented.
Tell me whether my expectations were specific enough to be fair or
vague enough to be a setup.
H8: Hiring Over Someone Internal
I have a [senior role] open above [employee] who wants it. I am
bringing in someone else. Play them hearing the news. Push on the
reasoning, on the new hire's authority, on whether I should have told
them earlier. Tell me whether the relationship is salvageable based on
how I handled it. Employee context: [paste]
A: Authority
A1: The Board Disagreement
Board chair has decided on [topic]. I think it is wrong. Decision not
final. Play the chair in a private conversation where I push back. Use
how board chairs at [company stage] respond to founder pushback. Tell
me whether I made a substantive or a status seeking case, and the
sentence to cut before the real conversation. Chair context: [paste]
A2: Telling the Lead Investor a Hard Truth
I need to tell the lead investor [hard truth]. They have not heard
this version. Play their role. Lead with the question they would ask
before letting me finish. Tell me whether I sounded in control or like
I was managing them. Investor profile: [paste]
A3: The Founder Disagreement (Operator View)
I am [role] reporting to a founder who wants [paste]. I think it is
wrong. Play the founder hearing me push back. Use how founders react
to operator pushback at this stage. Three rounds. Tell me whether my
framing positioned me as a partner or an obstacle. Founder dynamics:
[paste]
A4: Asking for the Raise
I am about to ask my [boss / board] for a raise. Case: [paste]. Market
data: [paste]. Play their role and posture in comp conversations. After
three rounds, tell me whether my case was strongest on business
contribution, market data, or relationship history, and which to lead
with.
A5: The Strategic Disagreement at All Hands
At next all hands, leadership presents [direction]. I disagree with
[specific part]. Three options: raise publicly, raise privately first,
do not raise. Play the leader presenting. Simulate each option and
its downstream effects. End with the option that protects credibility
and serves the company.
A6: The Promotion Denial Conversation
[Manager] denied my promotion to [role]. Stated reason: [paste]. Real
reason: [paste my read]. Play the manager in a conversation where I
press for clarity. Stay in posture. Tell me which probes actually got
at the truth and which made it worse.
A7: Telling a Mentor They Are Wrong
[Mentor] gave strong advice on [topic] that does not fit my situation.
Relationship is valuable. Play them receiving polite disagreement.
Stay in role. Tell me whether my framing respected the relationship or
sounded like graduate energy mentors find irritating. Mentor context:
[paste]
A8: The Resignation That Is Actually a Negotiation
I am about to resign from [role]. Open to staying if [conditions]. The
leader does not know yet if this is real or a negotiation in disguise.
Play their role across both versions. Tell me how they read me in
each and which signals tipped them. Identify what in my plan gives
away the version before I want it to.
R: Relationship
R1: The Cofounder Direct Talk
I have thought for [time] that my cofounder and I have a structural
problem in how we work. Specifically: [paste]. I have not raised it.
Play my cofounder hearing it for the first time. Use what I have told
you about their character. Tell me whether I led with the issue or
the relationship, and which should actually come first given who they
are. Cofounder context: [paste]
R2: The Peer Drift Conversation
A close peer at [company] has been drifting in performance and
engagement for [time]. We are not in a reporting line. I care about
them. Play them in a conversation where I bring it up as a friend, not
a colleague. Tell me whether my opener came across as caring or judging.
R3: The Boundary Setting Conversation
[Person] has a pattern of [behaviour] that affects my work. I have not
addressed it. Play them in a conversation where I do. Use the version
of them who feels criticised. Tell me whether I set the boundary
clearly or framed it as a request they could negotiate. Pattern and
relationship: [paste]
R4: The Conflict Repair After a Bad Meeting
[Person] and I had a bad meeting yesterday. I said [paste]. They said
[paste]. I want to repair without rehashing. Play their role in a
follow up I initiate. Three rounds. Tell me whether the conversation
closed the rift or just papered it over.
R5: The "I Cannot Be Your Reference Anymore" Conversation
[Former colleague] has been listing me as a reference. After recent
events I cannot endorse them at the level they need. Play them on the
call where I tell them. Tell me whether my framing protected their
dignity while being honest, or slipped into one at the cost of the
other.
R6: The Cofounder Equity Renegotiation
My cofounder and I split equity [paste original]. I now think it
should be [paste proposed]. Reason: [paste]. Play them hearing it.
Use how they process information. Three rounds. Tell me whether the
relationship survives the proposal even if the answer is no.
R7: The Mentor Who Has Become a Constraint
A mentor central to my career is offering advice that does not fit my
stage. Relationship is real. I need to gradually rebalance without
ending it. Play their role in a conversation where I signal the career
is going where they would not. Tell me whether the relationship is
graduating or eroding based on how it went.
R8: The Friend Who Asks for a Favour You Cannot Do
Close friend asked me to [favour]. I cannot. Reason: [paste]. Play
them on the call where I say no. Tell me whether my no preserved the
friendship or gave them a reason to feel something about me they did
not have before.
D: Decline
D1: The Customer Who Wants a Discount You Will Not Give
[Customer] is asking for [percent] discount. Sets a precedent I will
not set. I do not want to lose them. Play their role. Use how
procurement teams react to declined discount asks. Three rounds. Tell
me whether I held price while moving the relationship forward or at
the cost of the relationship. Customer context: [paste]
D2: The Investor Pass That Should Sound Like a Pass
[Investor] expressed interest in [round] but fit is wrong. I want to
decline cleanly without burning the relationship. Play their role.
Use how investors hear pass signals. Tell me whether my decline read
as a clean pass or as "come back when traction is better."
D3: The Customer Who Wants a Feature That Is Not Coming
[Customer] has asked for [feature] for [time]. Not on the roadmap,
will not be. Important account, escalating. Play their role in a
candid conversation where I tell them. Tell me whether I gave them
what they need to make a clean decision or gave them ambiguity that
wastes everyone's time.
D4: The Opportunity I Should Decline But Want to Accept
[Opportunity] offered. Exciting. Would pull me from [current priority]
at the wrong moment. I should decline. Play the person extending it.
Make the case for accepting. Three rounds. Tell me whether my decline
reasoning held under pressure or had a soft spot. The soft spot is
where I am most likely to override my own judgement.
D5: The Intro Request I Should Not Make
[Person] asked me to introduce them to [contact]. I do not think the
intro will be valuable for [contact]. Play [contact] in a hypothetical
conversation where they tell me later how the intro landed. Tell me
whether the intro would cost me or build credit.
D6: The Speaking Slot Decline
[Conference / podcast] invited me to [speak / appear]. Flattering.
Audience and timing do not fit what I am building toward. Play the
organiser hearing the decline. Tell me whether my decline preserves
the relationship for a future yes, and what sentence does that work
without committing.
D7: The Internal Resource Request
[Internal stakeholder] asked for [resource / time / headcount]. I do
not have it without harming a higher priority. Play them in the
conversation where I decline. Use the version of them who escalates
when they hear no. Tell me whether I framed the no as a budget
decision or a strategic one. The difference determines whether they
accept or appeal.
D8: The Pro Bono Ask
[Person] asked me to do [pro bono work] for their cause. Cause is
real. I cannot do it well at current bandwidth. Play them on the call.
Tell me whether my decline made it about my bandwidth (which they can
argue with) or about my standards (which they cannot), and which
framing actually serves them.
E: Endings
E1: The Firing Conversation
I am firing [name] from [role] on [date]. Reason: [paste]. For cause,
not performance. Play their role on the call. Lead with the first
question. Use the version of them under stress. Three rounds. After,
tell me which sentences carried legal risk, which were merciful, and
which were neither. HR has signed off on: [paste]
E2: The Performance Termination
Terminating [name] for performance after [time]. They were on a plan,
did not hit it, case is documented. Play their role on the call. First
reaction will be [predicted]. Use that. Tell me whether my framing
held them accountable without humiliating them, and the one sentence
that would have done better.
E3: The Layoff Conversation
Informing [name] their role is being eliminated as part of restructure
on [date]. Not about performance. Play their role. Lead with the
question that catches me off guard. Tell me whether I made the
structural reason clear enough that they will not spend a week
wondering if it was personal. Restructure context: [paste]. Severance:
[paste]
E4: The Long Term Vendor Breakup
Ending relationship with [vendor] after [time]. Reason: [paste]. Long
relationship, they did good work for years before the decline. Play
the [account manager / founder] receiving the news. Tell me whether
the conversation closed the relationship cleanly enough they would
still take my call in two years.
E5: The Customer Churn I Should Accept
[Customer] signalled they are leaving. I could probably save them. They
are not a fit for what we are building toward. I want to let them go
cleanly. Play their role on the call where I do not attempt the save.
Tell me whether the lack of save attempt registered as respect for
their decision or as indifference. Those land very differently.
E6: The Product Sunset With Power Users
Sunsetting [product / feature] on [date]. Power users have built
workflows around it. Play [power user] on the call. Tell me whether I
treated the loss they are absorbing as real or underweighted it. The
difference is whether they advocate for us or against us in the next
forum they are in.
E7: The Cofounder Exit
[Cofounder] and I have agreed in principle they will leave. The
structural conversation about equity, role, timing is the hard part.
Play them. Use how they process loss and identity. Three rounds. Tell
me whether I treated the conversation as a transaction or a
transition. The difference determines whether they remain a friend.
Cofounder context: [paste]. Proposed terms: [paste]
E8: The "It Did Not Work" Investor Update
The bet did not work. Company is winding down or significantly
downsizing. I owe investors the conversation. Play [lead investor]
hearing it. Use the version in difficult moments. Three rounds. Tell
me whether my framing took responsibility without collapsing into
apology, and which sentence to rewrite. Wind down context: [paste]
R: Renegotiation
R9: The Price Raise With an Existing Customer
Raising prices on [customer] by [percent] effective [date]. With us
[time] at the lower price. Play their role on the call. Use the
version of procurement who pushes back hard. Three rounds. Tell me
whether the raise sounded like a business decision or an apology
dressed up as one. Customer context: [paste]
R10: Walking Back a Public Commitment
Publicly committed to [paste] in [setting]. No longer realistic. I
have to walk it back without losing credibility. Play [audience]
hearing the walk back. Tell me whether the audience read it as honest
recalibration or as backtracking, and which sentence did the most
damage in either direction.
R11: The Partnership Restructure
[Partner] and I struck a deal [time] ago on [terms]. Execution
realities have made the deal imbalanced. I want to restructure to
[proposed]. Play them hearing it. Use the version of them who is loss
averse. Tell me whether the proposal protected the relationship or
made the partner feel taken advantage of.
R12: Asking for a Raise You Already Had
Received a raise to [paste] [time] ago. Role has expanded materially
since. I need to ask for another. Play [manager / board] hearing the
second ask. Three rounds. Tell me whether my case rested on scope
change (defensible) or personal value (defensible only once).
R13: The Renegotiation You Avoided
[Vendor / partner / employee] has terms with us we should have
renegotiated [time] ago and did not. Play their role in a conversation
where I bring it up now, far too late. Tell me whether my framing
acknowledged the delay without grovelling, and whether the case stood
on merits or relied on my apology for the delay.
R14: The Investor Re Up You Are Not Ready For
Current investor wants to lead the next round. Terms signalled are
below where I want it to price. Play their role on the call where I
push for better terms. Use the version of an existing investor who
feels they are doing me a favour by leading. Three rounds. Tell me
whether I created competitive tension or relied on the relationship
in a way that weakened my hand.
R15: The Equity Top Up Conversation
[Senior employee] asked for an equity top up. Case: [paste]. I am
inclined to grant a smaller version. Play their role hearing the
smaller offer. Tell me whether my framing positioned the offer as an
investment in them or as a managed disappointment.
R16: The "We Need to Change the Deal" Conversation
Deal struck with [counterparty] [time] ago has revealed an asymmetry I
did not see at signing. I need to reopen. Play their role hearing the
reopener. Use the version who feels the original deal was fair. Tell
me whether my case sounded like a renegotiation or a request for
charity, and which is more likely to actually shift terms.
Bonus Prompt B1: The Conversation You Have Been Avoiding For Months
There is a conversation I have been avoiding for [time] with [person]
about [paste]. Write three openers. First treats the avoidance honestly.
Second treats it as a new realisation. Third skips the avoidance and
goes to substance. For each, tell me what they will hear underneath.
End by telling me which opener is right for who they are and how we
got here.
Bonus Prompt B2: The Self Audit Before the Conversation
I am about to have a hard conversation about [topic] with [person] in
[time]. Before I do, run a self audit. What am I overweighting because
of my anxiety, underweighting because of my bias, rehearsing in my
head that probably will not happen, and what is the one piece of
information I have not confirmed because confirming it would make the
conversation harder to delay. Be tough.
The HARDER Framework in one image
H A R D E R
Hire Authority Relationship Decline Endings Renegotiation
Not strictly sequential. You reach for one pillar this month, a different one next. The point is that when you sit down to prepare, you know which pillar you are in and find the right rehearsal prompt rather than rehearsing in your head until you talk yourself out of having the conversation entirely.
How to combine HARDER with your model of choice
ChatGPT: 4 series stays in role across multiple turns. o series is stronger for the post conversation audit. A workable pattern: run the role play with 4 series, then ask o series to audit the transcript.
Claude: the role play tends to be strongest of the major models. Claude stays in the difficult person's perspective for longer without breaking into hedging. Tell it explicitly to stay in role and not soften the counterparty.
Gemini: conversational mode is useful for naturalistic back and forth. Watch for the model breaking role into corporate language when topics get emotionally charged.
Cross model habit: run the same rehearsal in two models. Where both predict the same question or reaction, expect it. Where they diverge, the divergence itself is information about the genuine range of how the conversation might go.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why rehearse a hard conversation with AI instead of with a friend or coach?
You should still rehearse with a friend or coach when you can. AI is not a replacement. What AI is, that friends and coaches are not, is available at 11pm on a Tuesday when the conversation is at 9am Wednesday and you cannot sleep. The marginal cost of one more rehearsal is zero.
Will AI tell me what I want to hear?
If you let it, yes. The HARDER Framework is structured to prevent that. Each prompt asks the model to stay in the counterparty's role, not yours. Each ends with the model breaking role and telling you what worked and what did not. Where the prompts feel like they are coddling you, push back: "play the harshest credible version of this person, not the polite one."
Is it ethical to rehearse a conversation with AI without telling the other person?
You rehearse difficult conversations in your head every day without telling the other person. AI rehearsal is the same activity with better fidelity. The ethical line is in what you actually do in the real conversation. AI rehearsal makes most people behave more honestly because it surfaces dynamics they would otherwise paper over.
Can I use these prompts with confidential personnel data?
Check the data retention policy of your model tier. Enterprise tiers of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini offer data retention controls that allow internal personnel data. Consumer tiers usually do not. For firing or layoff rehearsals on a consumer tier, anonymise names and details. The rehearsal works without them.
How is the HARDER Framework different from "how to fire someone" articles?
How to articles tell you what to say. The HARDER Framework rehearses how the other person will hear what you say, and how they will respond, before you say it. Most leaders fail at hard conversations not because they did not have a script, but because they did not anticipate the other person's specific reaction and got knocked off the script in the first 30 seconds.
Is there a paid version of these prompts?
Yes. The fifty prompts above are the free version, in compact form. The HARDER Pro Pack includes 150 expanded prompts with example outputs, chained variants for multi turn rehearsal, ready to load Claude Projects and custom GPT configurations for each pillar, and role specific rehearsal sets for founders, operators, people leaders, and sales leaders. The Pro Pack is on the PromptLeadz Pro Collection at $29.
Where to go next
HARDER sits alongside the CRITIC Framework in the contrarian half of the PromptLeadz Free Vault. CRITIC is for the thinking that happens at your desk. HARDER is for the conversations that happen across the table. Both are LLM agnostic, both are free.
The hardest conversations of your career will be the ones you have already had at least once before, in your head, with a model, the night before. That is not weakness. That is craft.
PromptLeadz publishes battle tested AI prompt packs for founders, product, sales, marketing, operations, HR, finance, customer success, adversarial thinking, and hard conversations. All prompts are LLM agnostic. Pricing is in USD.
Legg igjen en kommentar: